Marianne Fenech
Jennifer Sumsion
Joy Goodfellow
Macquarie University

While early childhood professionals in NSW are accountable to a substantial collection of regulatory requirements, little research has explored the outcomes of this regulatory environment, both intended and otherwise. This paper presents findings from a NSW study and shows how early childhood professionals working in long day care centres perceive the regulatory environment to impact on their professional practice. Specific attention is given to the impact of the national Quality Improvement and Accreditation System and the NSW Children’s Services Regulation. The notion of the regulatory environment as a ‘double-edged sword’ emerges as a useful conceptual metaphor to understand how early childhood professionals perceive these regulatory frameworks to impact on their practice. Findings show that the benefits afforded by accreditation and the Regulation are offset by unfulfilled intentions and unintended outcomes.

Keywords: regulation, accreditation, long day care, early childhood, professional practice

AJEC Volume 31 No 3 September 2006, pp. 49-58.

You can purchase this issue of the Australian Journal of Early Childhood now.